Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tina Caliga's avatar

Excellent Article. He speaks the truth!

Expand full comment
Herbie's avatar

Editors and news producers make decisions every day about which articles, editorials, and essays to publish. Is it newsworthy? Is it interesting? Is the author credible? Is there an alternative piece that readers will find more engaging and truthful? The writer was able to get his essay placed - on someone else's substack blog. Isn't this validation enough of its worthiness?

If heat waves were as deadly as the media says they are, people could not have survived thousands of years without air conditioning. Homo sapiens are resilient. We adapt to changing conditions. In the past, heat waves were treated as a normal part of summer. Now we are barraged with heat warnings

and climate hypochondriacs who are telling the young people that they are doomed. Call it what you will - eco-anxiety, solastalgia, eco grief - if you are engaged in alarmism, you're probably just getting the young people to redirect their negative emotions toward something that can't really be accurately measured or changed - the changing climate. Climate has always been cyclical, and always will be.

Attributing every feeling of sadness or guilt to a so-called doomed climate or a doomed Earth makes people climate hypochondriacs - and they will only get worse with time - possibly resulting in mental

conditions worthy of the DSM-5.

Let's realize please that hot weather in summer is not aberrant, that it is normal to sometimes feel

sad, that a doctor can write a heartfelt, well-written essay expressing his true feelings and anxieties

and experience rejection of that essay, and that life goes on.

"... do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble." Matthew, last line of chapter 6.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts